The Four Myths of Business Innovation: Part 2, Myth #1 | Unpublished
Hello!
×

Warning message

  • Last import of users from Drupal Production environment ran more than 7 days ago. Import users by accessing /admin/config/live-importer/drupal-run
  • Last import of nodes from Drupal Production environment ran more than 7 days ago. Import nodes by accessing /admin/config/live-importer/drupal-run

Unpublished Opinions

Ian Graham's picture
Ottawa, Ontario
About the author

Ian Graham thinks different, challenges the status quo and is a passionate entrepreneur committed to helping early-stage businesses in Ottawa succeed and grow. He has close to a decade of hands on practical experience working in a variety of roles with a number of very early stage businesses. Ian has a deep personal interest in macro-economics, entrepreneurship, innovation and policy to facilitate the growth of entrepreneurial ecosystems. He spends much of his “spare” time researching and writing on these topics.

Like it

The Four Myths of Business Innovation: Part 2, Myth #1

February 3, 2014

MYTH: Gazelles (High Growth Startups) create the most net new jobs.

REALITY: Small Self-funded bootstrapped businesses create 99% of all NET new jobs.

There is a popular misconception that VC funded high-growth startups create the most net new jobs. I have done some research in this area and while VC funding is an important part of the startup ecosystem, it only represents a very small portion of the net new jobs created. New self-funded bootstrapped companies create the most net new jobs. I use two concepts to illustrate this point: “the startup hockey analogy” and “funding math”.

ian-2.png

The Startup Hockey Analogy is based on the premise that the relative skill level of new business founders is similar to the skill distribution of professional athletes. The number of founder/athletes that can start and build a scalable startup (gazelle or high-growth startup) is very small. The NHL has roughly 1,000 players in North America from a population pool of 330 million. The assumption is that of all startups the relative distribution of companies by skill level is equivalent to the distribution of professional sports. Each level in the pyramid becomes increasingly more difficult to attain. Very few startups make it to the top tier and receive funding by an Initial Public Offering (IPO).

ian-3.png

The “Funding Math” diagram categorizes early stage businesses by funding type: Self-Funded, Angel or VC. This diagram is based on US SBA incorporation, data from Basil Peters on Angel funding and Scott Shane’s book “Fool’s Gold”. The data by funding type is from 2005 to 2010 in the US and I often read “EQ Journal”, a blog by Dr. Bruce Firestone. Dr. Firestone had written the following post which gives insights into funding by type: “Things Every Tech Startup Needs to Know about Self-Capitalization. My assumption is that the funding numbers for Canada would be similar to the US 2005 to 2010 data if not skewed more toward self-funded companies because of the lack of VC funding. Therefore based on “Funding Math” calculation the number of NET NEW jobs created in the US between 2005 and 2010 by VC funded companies was 30,000 while self-funded and bootstrapped companies accounted for 2,500,000 NET NEW jobs in the US. Boot strapped and self-funded companies account for 99% of all NET NEW jobs.