no accountability for City of Ottawa official boondoggles | Unpublished
Hello!
×

Warning message

  • Last import of users from Drupal Production environment ran more than 7 days ago. Import users by accessing /admin/config/live-importer/drupal-run
  • Last import of nodes from Drupal Production environment ran more than 7 days ago. Import nodes by accessing /admin/config/live-importer/drupal-run

Unpublished Opinions

Earle Rheaume's picture
Ottawa, Ontario
About the author

Looking back over 81 years I had the good fortune to have had a wonderful mom, a great wife and family, a successful career in business and excellent health. Sure there were ups and downs but they were too few to mention. Retirement for me means giving back some of that good fortune and I have chosen to advocate for those citizens who for reasons of their own cannot or will not fight for themselves. They include the old, sick poor, disabled and homeless.

Like it

no accountability for City of Ottawa official boondoggles

June 7, 2013

An Ontario legislated Code of Conduct is necessary for Ottawa to avoid the circus like fiasco between Toronto Mayor Ron Ford and  City Council...
 
The action of legislating; is specifically the exercise of the power and function of making rules (as laws) that have the force of authority by virtue of their promulgation by an official organ of a state or other organization.
 
And the legislation should not only include the mayor and city council. It should include all unelected officials.

Dear Ottawa residents,

Did you know that Ottawa City Council, including the Mayor and non elected officials, are exempt and not accountable for most of their actions? We are only kidding ourselves if we believe otherwise.

For instance, the Ontario Municipal Act 2001 states;

Immunity:

448. (1) No proceeding for damages or otherwise shall be commenced against a member of council or an officer, employee or agent of a municipality or a person acting under the instructions of the officer, employee or agent for any act done in good faith in the performance or intended performance of a duty or authority under this Act or a by-law passed under it or for any alleged neglect or default in the performance in good faith of the duty or authority. 2001, c. 25, s. 448 (1).

Read the next section. They CAN and SHOULD be held accountable.

Liability for torts:

(2) Subsection (1) does not relieve a municipality of liability to which it would otherwise be subject in respect of a tort committed by a member of council or an officer, employee or agent of the municipality or a person acting under the instructions of the officer, employee or agent. 2001, c. 25, s. 448 (2).

Do you think this is right?

Earle Rheaume