Stop PM/Premier Power Abuses letter writing campaign

Stop PM/Premier Power Abuses letter writing campaign
Posted on June 25, 2014 | Democracy Watch | Written on June 25, 2014
Comments

Publisher

Publisher:
Stop the Supremos! by Democracy Watch

Author's Note:

Author's Note:

There is an elite club running Canada – the SuPremos.  They are almost all powerful, unchecked by anyone, and restricted by few laws.  Even the Constitution doesn’t stop them from abusing many of their powers.  Most watchdogs can’t touch them, and their actions often strike fear in the hearts of Canadians.

The SuPremos have the power to make decisions that can change the cost of everything you pay for, and can affect whether the air you breathe and water you drink are clean or dirty, what kind of car you can buy, what kind of clothes you can buy, what you are allowed to eat and drink and many other things in your life.

Their abuses of power can only be stopped if thousands of people ACT NOW

Our letter to polititians is below. Join our campaign by sending your own letter calling on politicians across Canada to make key changes to restrict the excessive powers of Canada's Prime Minister and Premiers.

<< Click here to send your letter now >>

Stop the SuPremos! Please Share this page with everyone you know.

 

Dear political party leaders:

According to all experts, the powers of the Canadian Prime Minister and provincial premiers exceed the powers of any other democratically elected leader in the world.

Their powers are clearly excessive and include the power to appoint whomever they want as the heads of hundreds of government institutions without any checks or balances; to declare any matter a vote of confidence; to introduce omnibus bills that force politicians to vote on many unrelated measures at the same time; to control the members of the party caucuses through the power to approve election candidates; to call snap elections and to shut down or open the legislature whenever they want, and; to refuse to initiate a public inquiry even when there is clear evidence of violations of government policies.

Britain, Australia and New Zealand have restricted these powers with clearly written constitutional conventions and laws. Nunavut and the Northwest Territories have restricted these powers by not having political parties, and by making decisions by consensus.

Some other Canadian jurisdictions have restricted some of these powers -- for example Ontario has a semi-independent appointments secretariat that conducts searches for Cabinet appointees and provides short lists to Cabinet.

A large majority of Canadians want the powers of the Prime Minister and premiers restricted. A national survey of more than 2,000 Canadians by Harris-Decima in November-December 2012 showed that 84% of adult Canadians want enforceable rules to restrict key powers of the PM and the Premiers. And a national survey of 1,007 Canadians by Environics in May 2013 found that 71% want legal restrictions on party leader powers to ensure politicians in each party have more power and freedom to represent voters.

Therefore, I call on you to follow the lead of most other countries in the world that claim to be democracies by passing laws that make the following 20 key changes to restrict the excessive powers of the Prime Minister and premiers:

Restrict the powers of the PM/premiers to make decisions without public consultation

  1. Pass a law requiring meaningful public consultation before the government makes any significant decision, with the report on the consultation results required to be released publicly before the decision is made;

    Restrict the powers of the PM/premiers to make appointments

  2. establish an independent Public Appointments Commission (with the members chosen by a majority of party leaders in the legislature) to conduct public, merit-based searches for a short-list of candidates for Cabinet appointments, and require that a majority of party leaders approve the candidate chosen for every Cabinet appointment (especially the appointments of all democratic good government watchdogs and officers of Parliament, and the Governor General and provincial lieutenant governors); Restrict the powers of the PM/Premiers to control the legislature
  3. make it clear in a law that a non-confidence vote is only a specific resolution passed by a majority that states that the legislature does not have confidence in the government;
  4. prohibit omnibus bills (especially budgets) that amend unrelated laws all at once;
  5. require the opening of the legislature within 30 days after each election;
  6. restrict the shutting down of the legislature (prorogation) to times when the legislature is already adjourned, and otherwise for no more than two weeks and only if approved by two-thirds of politicians in the legislature;
  7. require all government watchdog agencies to release their reports and rulings whenever they are completed, whether or not the legislature is open, and;
  8. require that, when the legislature opens after a prorogation shutdown, all government and opposition bills under review before the shutdown are continued at the same stage of review.

    Restrict the power of the PM/premiers (and all party leaders) to control politicians in their party

  9. prohibit party leaders from appointing election candidates unless there is no party association in the riding or candidate elected by the riding association;
  10. prohibit political parties from refusing the nomination of a candidate as long as the candidate meets minimal “character” qualifications and is elected by the riding association;
  11. give the elections watchdog agencies (Elections Canada etc.) the mandate and power to oversee nomination races for election candidates to ensure they are run fairly;
  12. restrict the use of “whipping” of politicians in a caucus to force them to vote as the party leader wants only to matters on which the party had a clear, written platform promise in the previous election;
  13. if a party does not have a clear position on an issue, clearly stated in the previous election and communicated to all candidates in that election before they became a candidate, then prohibit the party or party leader from disciplining any politician who takes a different position on the issue in any statement they make, or in any vote;
  14. give politicians in each party (not party leaders) the power to choose members of the committees of the legislature;
  15. give politicians in each party (not party leaders) the power to decide who sits in caucus;
  16. clearly empower a majority of the caucus of each party to initiate a review of the party leader’s leadership of the party, with a vote of approval or disapproval by the members of the party;
  17. require the speaker of the legislature to choose who asks questions in each daily question period randomly, ensuring only that the number of questions per party matches the percentage of seats each party has in the legislature over each weekly period, and;
  18. give every member of the legislature the clear right to say whatever they want during their time for a member statement.

    Allow majority of party leaders to initiate public inquiries

  19. change the public inquiries law to allow a majority of party leaders in the legislature to initiate a public inquiry into violations of government policies that are not investigated by any legal authority (and, if there are only two parties represented in the legislature, to allow the opposition party leader and Auditor General to initiate a public inquiry), with all party leaders approving the choice of the inquiry commissioner(s).

    Restrict the power of the PM/premiers to call unfair snap elections

  20. pass a law fixing election dates for the third week in October every four years unless a resolution declaring the non-confidence of the legislature in the government is passed during the four-year period.

    Please let me know what you will do to ensure that these changes are made as soon as possible. I will be deciding which political party to vote for in the next election based on the responses I receive from representatives in each party. I look forward to hearing from you.

Related article

Related article:

About The Author

Democracy Watch is a national non-profit, non-partisan organization, and Canada’s leading citizen group advocating democratic reform, government accountability and corporate responsibility.

Our goal is to... More