Judge decides Douglas Cardinal and other OMB appellants are “public interest litigants”

Judge decides Douglas Cardinal and other OMB appellants are “public interest litigants”
Posted on November 18, 2016 | Freeing Chaudière Falls and its Islands | Written on November 18, 2016
Comments
Letter type:
Open

Author's Note:

Author's Note:

A 5-page ruling by Ontario Superior Court judge says the five people who challenged a City of Ottawa rezoning of two islands that are part of an Algonquin sacred site in the Ottawa River do not have to pay court costs. 

In a written statement issued November 17, Justice Charles Hackland announced he will waive court costs sought by the City of Ottawa and the condo developer Windmill Development Group against the five individuals who challenged the City’s planning decision to rezone Chaudière and Albert Islands from parkland to commercial/residential, namely from public space to private space.

“I accept the appellants’ submission that they should be considered public interest litigants,” Justice Hackland said in his ruling. He also noted, “The appellants are concerned individuals attempting to address indigenous issues of broad concern which may impact the public generally.”

This means that some $66,550 in court costs will not be paid by Douglas Cardinal, Romola Trebilcock, Dan Gagne, Larry McDermott and Richard Jackman. Along with Lindsay Lambert, who was an appellant in the first appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), they have spent almost two years challenging the city’s rezoning of the islands at the OMB, and then appealing the OMB’s rebuff of their case.

The challenge to the city’s rezoning of the islands in downtown Ottawa in the middle of the Ottawa River was based on the appellants’ view that the islands are a sacred site with deep spiritual significance to the Algonquin people. They attempted to argue that the City’s rezoning in support of a condo development proposed by Windmill Development Group did not take into account the constitutional rights and legitimate concerns of indigenous people.

Romola Trebilcock, an appellant who supports Grandfather William Commanda’s work and vision for a Circle of All Nations at the sacred island site, Asinabka, said the judge’s ruling acknowledges that “our overall aim was in the public interest and not for personal gain.”

“I also feel strongly that all the legal challenges to date have not allowed me to elaborate on the reasons for endorsing Elder Commanda’s vision for the site,” she added, referring to the fact that the case at the OMB only reached the pre-hearing phase.

The appellants launched subsequent appeals because they felt that the pre-hearing by the OMB, which lasted 2 days in August 2015, did not give them a chance to outline their arguments against the City of Ottawa’s rezoning of the islands. The most recent rejection of their appeals came on October 26—a case for which costs have not yet been assessed.

Justice Hackland’s written statement says:

“…issues regarding indigenous religious sites are important issues of public interest extending beyond the interest of the parties to this proceeding.”

In outlining his reasons, he also notes that the appellants “have no financial interest in the matter. They sought adjudication on whether the islands were historically an indigenous sacred site…”  

He also concluded that “the historical, cultural and constitutional submissions they sought to advance are certainly not frivolous or vexatious…sacred site litigation is a developing aspect of indigenous law.”

On the question of “whose historical interest are connected to these islands and are relevant to this project,” the judge’s ruling says he does not see the Algonquins of Ontario organization as having the “sole legitimate right to address the indigenous concerns relevant to this development.”

Justice Hackland notes in his statement that the City of Ottawa and Windmill Development Group have “a clearly superior capacity to bear the costs” linked to the court proceedings. 

comments powered by Disqus